One health: in the context of pet ownership

One health: in the context of pet ownership

Image © Julija / Adobe Stock.

Although the one health programme is not new, it has become increasingly important over the past few years¹. In this article, Norbert Mencke discusses the connection between human, animal and environmental health.

Contents

One health is a multi-disciplinary unifying approach that was originally derived from the medicinal and veterinary “one medicine” idea. It was expanded in 2004, by adding the environment into the concept, acknowledging the fact that the health of humans, animals and the ecosystem are inextricably connected2,3.

The one health approach covers many aspects such as food and water safety, nutrition, zoonosis control, pollution management and antimicrobial resistance4. While the threat of zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance made one health initiatives initially focus on food-producing and wild animals, it is clear that small animal medicine also has an important role in public health. The dog is still centre of many one health initiatives5,6, but clearly cats have become increasingly important.

One health pet initiatives

“Project Laurent” is a Canadian interdisciplinary “one health” research programme. It was born from the initiative of Hélène Tessier, a Canadian small animal veterinarian, whose son was diagnosed with liver cancer at the age of 10 years. The family owned a dog at that time which was an important family member and provided enormous emotional support during the son’s journey through chemotherapy and liver transplant.

One branch of Project Laurent works on surveys and studies that are designed to determine the prevalence of zoonotic parasites in both pets and immunosuppressed humans.

The World Small Animal Veterinary Association One Health Committee (OHC), created in 2010, aims to internationally promote the importance of companion animals in the one health concept. The committee works and supports research in the following main areas: the human-companion animal bond; zoonotic diseases; and comparative (medical and veterinary) clinical research. One fascinating OHC project focused on comparative oncology in the search for an optimised drug development for humans and dogs.

Human-animal bond changes

Changes in the human-animal bond have greatly influenced the characteristics of pet ownership over the past decades. Nowadays, dogs and cats are not only kept as work animals (for house protection or rodent control), but also for their social features and their ability to provide companionship5.

In fact, many dogs and cats in today’s households spend most of their life indoors rather than outdoors, and live in close contact with their owners. Especially with cats, a growing trend in some parts of the world exists to give them an “indoor-only” lifestyle7.

At Vetoquinol’s second Scientific Round Table, held in Athens, in March 2023, Ezio Ferroglio, professor of parasitology and parasitic diseases at the University of Turin, Italy, said: “Thanks to the development of effective antiparasitic treatments and a better understanding of parasitic diseases in small animal medicine, the role of dogs and cats has changed from outdoor-living work animals to indoor-residing family members.”

Positive effects of pet ownership

Already in the 1970s, scientists acknowledged the positive role of dogs in psychotherapy for children8. For families with growing children, pets can be part of the social support system and provide opportunities to educate children, and for them to experience nurturance9.

Also, for elderly people, it was shown that owning pets can have socialising effects and stress-reducing benefits, as well as a positive influence on the mental and physical well-being9,10.

Study results have demonstrated that pet-facilitated therapy programmes in nursing homes had positive effects on the emotional and physical health of their residents11,12. The role of dogs and cats became even more important during the COVID pandemic, when social distancing and other countermeasures resulted in social isolation and loneliness, not only for the elderly13,14.

Pet ownership for patients who are immunocompromised

For some patients with chronic medical conditions that include immunosuppression (for example, genetic immunodeficiency, cancer, AIDS), pet ownership might seem to be out of the question, as the risk of acquiring life-threatening infections from pets simply seems to be too high.

Many potential viral, bacterial and parasitic zoonoses exist that can be transmitted from dogs and cats to humans, many of them from bite or scratch injuries15-17.

However, the mental and physical benefits of pet companionship is why many physicians and scientists promote pet ownership also for the vulnerable sections of the human population. Clinical guidelines exist for immunocompromised patients that include recommendations for a life with animals18.

Some uncertainties remain, however, and a lot of knowledge gaps are still present.

Christopher Fernandez-Prada, assistant professor and director of the Parasitology Diagnostic Service at the University of Montreal, Canada, said at Vetoquinol’s 2nd Scientific Round Table: “There is still only limited scientific evidence about what pet ownership does for mental health and lifestyle behaviour in the transplanted immunosuppressed population.

“Moreover, current prevalence data of zoonotic parasites in companion animals are really scarce.”

Zoonotic pathogens and diseases that can be transmitted from cats to humans

One health guidance for pet owners

The American Veterinary Medical Association says: “Veterinarians are the first and best line of defence against animal diseases.”

Indeed, small animal practitioners and their clinic staff have a key role in pet owner education and zoonotic disease prevention. Current zoonosis prevention recommendations for pet owners include a minimum of four criteria5,18:

More specified recommendations exist for households with immunocompromised patients15,17:

The following good personal hygiene measures are important for any pet owner, irrespective of their immune status5:

Pet owners should be advised to apply the following hygiene measures in the kitchen, the home and the outdoor environment5:

Key messages for the veterinary practitioner

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). One health basics, tinyurl.com/37w6r77e
  2. American Veterinary Medical Association (2008). One health: a new professional imperative, One Health Initiative Task Force: final report, tinyurl.com/3nu8c44c
  3. One World – One Health (https://oneworldonehealth.wcs.org).
  4. World Health Organization (2017). One health – Q&A section, tinyurl.com/5n8vhnc4
  5. Overgaauw PAM, Vinke CM, Hagen MAEV and Lipman LJA (2020). A one health perspective on the human-companion animal relationship with emphasis on zoonotic aspects, Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(11): 3,789.
  6. Plante A, Bedrossian N, Cadotte G, Piché A, Michael F, Bédard S, Tessier H, Fernandez-Prada C, Sabiston CM, Dieudé M and Doré I (2023). Pet ownership and lifestyle behaviours of immunosuppressed individuals and their relatives in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, Prev Med Rep 33: 102210.
  7. Foreman-Worsley R, Finka LR, Ward SJ and Farnworth MJ (2021). Indoors or outdoors? An international exploration of owner demographics and decision making associated with lifestyle of pet cats, Animals 11(2): 253.
  8. Wierenga-Van Beelen JJ (1977). Het kleine huisdier in zijn sociale functie [Social function of pets (author’s trans)], Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 102(16): 992-996.
  9. Hart LA (1995). The role of pets in enhancing human well-being: effects for older people. In Robinson I (ed), The Waltham Book of Human-Animal Interaction: Benefits and Responsibilities of Pet Ownership, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford: 19-31.
  10. Johnson RA (2013). Promoting one health: the University of Missouri Research Center for Human/Animal Interaction, Mo Med 110(3): 197-200.
  11. Yates J (1987). Project PUP: the perceived benefits to nursing home residents, Anthrozoös 1(3): 188-192.
  12. Sollami A, Gianferrari E, Alfieri M, Artioli G and Taffurelli C (2017). Pet therapy: an effective strategy to care for the elderly? An experimental study in a nursing home, Acta Biomed 88(1S): 25-31.
  13. Jezierski T, Camerlink I, Peden RSE, Chou J-Y,Sztandarski P and Marchewka J (2021). Cat owners’ perception on having a pet cat during the COVID-19 pandemic, PLoS One 16(10): e0257671.
  14. Reniers PWA, Leontjevas R, Declercq IJN, Enders-Slegers M-J, Gerritsen DL and Hediger K (2022). The significance of pets for vulnerable older adults during the covid-19 pandemic: an explorative qualitative study, Animals 12(20): 2,752.
  15. Steele RW (2008). Should immunocompromised patients have pets? Ochsner J 8(3): 134-139.
  16. Mencke N (2013). Future challenges for parasitology: vector control and ‘one health’ in Europe: the veterinary medicinal view on CVBDs such as tick borreliosis, rickettsiosis and canine leishmaniosis, Vet Parasitol 195(3-4): 256-271.
  17. Eward WC and Kirpensteijn J (2017). Should immunocompromised humans avoid pets? WSAVA One Health Committee, Clinicians Brief, tinyurl.com/2cyv6t6e
  18. Garcia-Sanchez P, Aguilar-Valero E,Sainz T, Calvo C, Iglesias I, Bueno D, Frauca E,Ramos-Boluda E, Alcolea-Sanchez A, García-Guereta L, Alonso-Melgar A, Esperón Fand Mendez-Echevarria A (2023). Immunocompromised children and young patients living with pets: gaps in knowledge to avoid zoonosis, Transbound Emerg Dis, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2151761